Review: The Tattered Banner

The Tattered Banner (Society of the Sword, #1)The Tattered Banner by Duncan M. Hamilton
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

[DISCLAIMER: I RECEIVED AN E-COPY OF THIS BOOK FROM THE AUTHOR IN EXCHANGE FOR AN HONEST REVIEW]

**There are some spoilery parts in this review**

The Tattered Banner is an almost-book. It almost gets deep into magic, almost has action and adventure, and almost has a conclusion. Instead it felt like the author was trying to tackle too many concepts at once, and they didn't quite connect in the right way. There's a sweet spot that authors try to hit, where everything works and the story comes together; this almost made it.

Soren is a poor street urchin who barely gets by day to day. He doesn't expect to live past his teens, but he still struggles on, all the while enjoying watching his hero, Amero, fight in the arenas. He practices his swordfighting by emulating Amero, and after Amero sees Soren fighting off a merchant from whom he'd stolen bread, Amero takes Soren into his service and sets him up at the swordfighting academy.

At first Soren is an outcast, and poor at his craft, but he learns and grows in his studies and soon bests all of his classmates. He has magic to thank for all of his talent, but magic has been outlawed for centuries. No one gives him information so he just bumbles around blindly, bit by bit learning a little more about his "powers." The Gift and the Moment are both explained in different ways, but the Gift is the most prevalent apparition.

On top of all of that, he falls in love, visits distant lands, is betrayed, and ends up not really having a path in life to follow. His directionless ambling through life has not prepared him for a career, and he seems unready for just about every challenge put in front of him, despite his Gift. His arrogance gets the best of him, and he realizes he can't control the one thing that gives him an advantage against others.

The time spent in Ruripathia becomes almost an afterthought once it's over, which is a shame because if Soren had spent more time reflecting on what happened there he may have discovered the direction in which he was heading sooner. He also ignores a lot of warning signs around himself and often gets himself into trouble with his irrational charging-in.

The ending of the novel was a stock villain-explains-all-while-believing-hero-will-die scenario, which kind of left me rolling my eyes, mostly as it had already been inferred throughout the rest of the book and revealing everything in a dramatic monologue defeats the purpose of foreshadowing.

While it seemed more like a series of vignettes in the life of a swordsman, the concept was well thought-out and could have been made more solid with a lot more exploration of the magic aspect, as well as the relationship with Ruripathia. The barbarian raids towards the middle-end of the book seem to not have done anything for the story except to propel Soren into a position of desirability for clandestine work. This could easily have been achieved, possibly better, by turning him into an assassin-for-hire as he had initially worked out with the illicit trader, as opposed to for the "government." Then again, I'm not the author - perhaps the barbarian hordes did serve a purpose, but they needed to be worked out a little more.

Overall I enjoyed the story, found it hard to keep track of some names, and felt that not enough detail was used with many aspects of Soren's abilities. It appears that this is only book 1, though, unless the ending truly was an ending, so maybe there will be opportunity for expansion in book 2. Recommended with reservations, if you can get past some missing details and recognize a good attempt at a first novel. It shows promise for future writings if any are forthcoming.

View all my reviews

When Authors Don't Like Your Review

Lately I've been doing a lot of reviews.  This is in part because I've finally started winning Goodreads Giveaways again, but also because I really want to let authors know what I think of their work.  If it's an older book I might not bother, but if it's relatively new I want to put it out there.

One thing I really try to stay away from in my negative reviews is cattiness - "This book was terrible!  Never read this book!" - and instead offer real constructive criticism - "I didn't like this part and this is why."  We all mess up sometimes, though, and I can get a little mean (perhaps my review of Scapemaker could have been taken as one giant F YOU to the author even if I meant to help...).  Part of that is because I just wasted a ton of time reading a book that I thought really wasn't good, and part of it is my own sort of literary ego, where I want everything I read to be amazing and if an author can't put something amazing out then they shouldn't bother writing in the first place.

Obviously, this is the wrong type of attitude when reviewing, but it happens to the best of us, and I am not without my faults.

One thing that I've noticed, however, is that authors who do not have a huge publishing house behind them tend to take the negative reviews a bit too personally.  Recently (within the last six months or so), I've had a couple authors reach out to me in what felt like a spiteful way because I had left them bad reviews.

Generally when that happens, I feel a little hurt, I take it personally, and I overreact.  The last time I asked if I was being crazy reading way too far into a comment, but at least others saw it too.  I try not to comment back right away because I want to cool down and take the time to read their comment and find out why they are so mad at my honesty.  Is it because I said they weren't interesting?  Is it because I said the book was poorly written?  Is it because I said it needed some editing before it hit print?  Whatever the reason, it obviously struck a nerve.

The best way for me to handle these situations is to address the comment calmly, if at all.  Sometimes I just ignore them, sometimes I only respond to one aspect that I feel I can defend without going all psycho-nasty on them because I just know if I respond to anything else you'll see one heck of a cat-fight going on.  And that's far from how I'd like to see any author represent him/herself.  Also, I don't want my future bosses to see me being nasty on the internet.  You know they look, admit it.

Anyway, I know how poorly I take criticism of any kind, so I try to look at the author and project myself onto him or her.  How would my review have made him feel?  How did my words hurt her ego?  And if I'm wrong, I'm wrong.  But if I can stand by it, then it stays up.

I'm honestly interested: Have you had an author react negatively to your bad review?  Have you ever left a bad review?  Has an author ever thanked you for a bad review? (I've had that one happen, which was interesting.)

Review: Hooray For Me

Hooray For Me: A Foggy MemoirHooray For Me: A Foggy Memoir by Ello Black
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

[DISCLAIMER: I RECEIVED A COPY OF THIS FROM THE GOODREADS GIVEAWAYS IN EXCHANGE FOR AN HONEST REVIEW]

I *really* wanted to enjoy this book, because it sounded so funny and interesting. Unfortunately, it just didn't live up to expectations. I read the little introduction, explaining that the spelling and grammar wasn't going to be standard because it's just the way she writes, which is fine, but I couldn't really get past it.

This book is a series of vignettes about Ello Black's life. It was too short to have any depth to it, and none of the stories related to each other except for the fact that they all had at least something to do with her dad (some more than others). Yes it was funny, and yes the stories were biographical, but at some point there needs to be cohesion and that cohesion just never came.

It was also difficult to read because of the voice. It was as if she was speaking the book to me instead of writing it, but that's not really how I enjoy to read. Dialect is one thing, but there should have at least been some proofreading done to make it grammatically correct. I know that she said in the intro that she isn't grammatically correct and that's just the way it is, but there's only so much of it that I can take before I start getting out my red pen.

I wish this had been more of a cohesive story and less of separate essays on various parts of her life that, frankly, weren't all that extraordinary in the first place. The chapter on her father's death was certainly heartbreaking and the chapter in which she recounts being bullied struck a chord with me. But the rest felt like filler.

Ello, you seem like a cool person and I hope you keep on being your bad self. And thanks for the book. It just didn't do it for me.

View all my reviews

Review: Desdaemona

DesdaemonaDesdaemona by Ben Macallan
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

This book is hard to review. I enjoyed the story, sort of, but didn't particularly click with the story-telling. Jordan's storyline never quite did it for me. And his complicated relationship with Desi was confusing because I never figured out whether he truly felt anything for her or if it was all her aspect pulling him along. I felt like I was being dropped into the middle of a series, rather than the beginning of one. The plot twist was not foreseen and I was left wondering "Well what happens next?" by the end. Not sure if I'll read to find out.

Not a bad read, just not up there with my favorites.

View all my reviews

Review: The Shadows Between Us by Tricia Levenseller

The Shadows Between Us by Tricia Levenseller My rating: 3 of 5 stars OK. I'm going to come at this from the angle that everyone (exc...